Techniques for cloud control and management

ABSTRACT

Techniques for cloud control and management are provided. The control, creation, and management of workloads in distributed infrastructures are coordinated via a master Configuration Management Database (CMDB). The master CMDB is also used to unify the multiple distributed infrastructures so that the workloads are rationalized. Moreover, data centers are coordinated with the distributed infrastructures so the configuration settings and policies included in the master CMDB are enforced and synchronized throughout the network.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.12/608,427, filed on Oct. 29, 2009, which claims the benefit of priorityunder 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No.61/224,206; entitled: “System and Method for Cloud Control andManagement,” and filed on Jul. 9, 2009, each of which is incorporatedherein by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

Enterprises are finding it increasingly difficult to stay abreast withthe rapidly evolving technology platforms. That is, software andhardware upgrades are commonplace for an information technology (IT)infrastructure of an enterprise and maintaining a state of the artinfrastructure is costly, time consuming, and distracts from thebusiness of an enterprise. But, there is no avoiding technology and theenterprise's business is intimately dependent on its underlyinginfrastructure. So, an enterprise is in a catch-22 position and isforced to maintain a costly IT infrastructure.

To remedy these concerns a new technology has been gaining acceptance inthe industry. This technology is referred to as “cloud computing.” Theterm “cloud” is used as a metaphor for how the Internet is depicted indiagrams and is used as an abstraction of the underlying infrastructure,which is being concealed with cloud computing. Cloud computing is oftendefined as computing capabilities that provide an abstraction betweencomputing resources and the underlying technical architecture (e.g.,servers, storage, networks), enabling convenient, on-demand networkaccess to a shared pool of configurable computing resources that can berapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort orservice provider interaction.

With cloud computing and cloud storage, enterprises are recognizing aneconomy of scale in migrating portions of their data centers to variouscloud providers. Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) is currently themost common mechanism for providing cloud computing and storage.Software as a Service (SaaS) and Platform as a Service (PaaS) arefocused more on providing specific services or specific platformservices rather than raw infrastructure.

Additionally, regulatory compliance is a critical part of today'senterprise operations. Information Technology Infrastructure Library(ITIL) is fast becoming the best practice model for enterprises tomanage their risk and compliance throughout their data centers and otherbusiness processes.

These regulatory concerns have become a road block to enterpriseacceptance of cloud computing. The enterprise wants more control andmanagement capabilities of any partial or full cloud implementationwithin the enterprise because without such assurances, the enterprisemay: run afoul with regulatory agencies, unduly expose the enterprise toliability, and even jeopardize valued customer relationships.

Thus, improved techniques for cloud control and management are needed.

SUMMARY

In various embodiments, techniques for cloud control and management arepresented. More specifically, and in an embodiment, a method for cloudcontrol and management is provided. Specifically, a master configurationmanagement database (CMDB) with master configuration settings and masterpolicies is configured for construction, management, and deployment ofworkloads assigned to distribute computing resources of a network. Next,a plurality of sub CMDB's is interfaced with a master CMDB to coordinatesub configuration settings and sub policies with the masterconfiguration settings and the master policies of the master CMDB. Eachsub CMDB controlling a particular set of the computing resources; eachset of the computing resources defining a particular distributedcomputing infrastructure.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagram of a method for cloud control and management,according to an example embodiment.

FIG. 2 is a diagram of another method for cloud control and management,according to an example embodiment.

FIG. 3 is a diagram of a cloud control management system, according toan example embodiment.

FIG. 4 is a diagram depicting interactions between components of a cloudcontrol management system, according to an example embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A “resource” includes a user, service, system, device, directory, datastore, groups of users, combinations of these things, etc. A “principal”is a specific type of resource, such as an automated service or userthat acquires an identity. A designation as to what is a resource andwhat is a principal can change depending upon the context of any givennetwork transaction. Thus, if one resource attempts to access anotherresource, the actor of the transaction may be viewed as a principal.

An “identity” is something that is formulated from one or moreidentifiers and secrets that provide a statement of roles and/orpermissions that the identity has in relation to resources. An“identifier” is information, which may be private and permits anidentity to be formed, and some portions of an identifier may be publicinformation, such as a user identifier, name, etc. Some examples ofidentifiers include social security number (SSN), user identifier andpassword pair, account number, retina scan, fingerprint, face scan, etc.

A “workload” defines processing loads, memory loads, storage loads, andprocessing capabilities for a processing environment.

A “processing environment” defines a set of cooperating computingresources, such as machines, storage, software libraries, softwaresystems, etc. that form a logical computing infrastructure. A “logicalcomputing infrastructure” means that computing resources can begeographically distributed across a network, such as the Internet. So,one computing resource at network site X and be logically combined withanother computing resource at network site Y to form a logicalprocessing environment.

A “data center” may be viewed as a processing environment for anenterprise. The data center can include, in some instances, multipleprocessing environments. The data center may contiguously reside withinan internally controlled network of the enterprise or the data centermay be distributed logically over internal and external networkconnections. In an embodiment, a data center includes just a certaintype of computing resource, such as storage, and other aspects of thedata center used for processing are acquired via another remoteprocessing environment. So, the data center does not have to beself-contained, the data center can borrow or share resources with otherprocessing environments.

A “Configuration Management Database” (CMDB) is a repository ofinformation related to all the components of a processing environment ora set of different distributed processing environments. The CMDBincludes configuration settings for the computing resources of aparticular processing environment or a set of processing environments.The configuration settings include attributes and relationships for eachcomputing resource and between the computing resources. For example, aconfiguration setting may state that within processing environment X,computing resource Y and Z are to communicate using Protocol P, where Yand Z define a relationship and P is an attribute of that relationship.

The CMDB also includes policies for the computing resources andprocessing environments. Policies include conditions and actions. Forexample, one policy may state a condition defined as “when resource X isaccessed” perform an action defined as “log information related to theaccess in resource Y.” Policies can be hierarchical, such that ahigher-level policy trumps a lower-level policy when conflicts betweenpolicies occur.

It is noted that just because the “CMDB” includes the word database,this is not to imply that the CMDB has to be a relational database orany database for that matter. That is, the CMDB can be any repository ofinformation where that repository can be directory based, databasebased, file based, table based, or a combination of some or all of thesethings.

Various embodiments of this invention can be implemented in existingnetwork architectures. For example, in some embodiments, the techniquespresented herein are implemented in whole or in part in the Novell®network and proxy server products, operating system products,directory-based products and other products distributed by Novell®,Inc., of Provo, Utah.

Also, the techniques presented herein are implemented in machines, suchas processor or processor-enabled devices. These machines are configuredto specifically perform the processing of the methods and systemspresented herein. Moreover, the methods and systems are implemented andreside within computer-readable storage media and processed on themachines configured to perform the methods.

Of course, the embodiments of the invention can be implemented in avariety of architectural platforms, devices, operating and serversystems, and/or applications. Any particular architectural layout orimplementation presented herein is provided for purposes of illustrationand comprehension only and is not intended to limit aspects of theinvention.

It is within this context that embodiments of the invention are nowdiscussed within the context of FIGS. 1-4.

FIG. 1 is a diagram of a method 100 for cloud control and management,according to an example embodiment. The method 100 (hereinafter “CMDBcompliance service”) is implemented in a machine-accessible andcomputer-readable medium and instructions that execute on one or moreprocessors (machines, computers, processors, etc.). The machine isspecifically configured to process the business intelligence service.Furthermore, the CMDB compliance service is operational over andprocesses within a network. The network may be wired, wireless, or acombination of wired and wireless.

At 110, the CMDB compliance service configures a master CMDB with masterconfiguration settings and master policies for the construction(creation), management, and deployment of workloads assigned todistributed computing resources of the network. In some cases, themaster configuration settings and master policies are that which areassigned or defined by an IaaS provider. In other cases, the masterconfiguration settings and master policies at least partially includethat which is assigned, required, or defined by the IaaS. In still morecases, the entire master configuration settings and master policies areindependent of any particular IaaS and may be associated with and/orassigned by an enterprise.

According to an embodiment, at 111, the CMDB compliance service furtherconfigures the master CMDB to assist in identity-based security for eachdistributed computing infrastructure (discussed below with reference tothe processing at 120). Here, Cloud Security Service (CSS) can beenforced via the master CMDB. In some cases, the identity-based securityis acquired and managed via a third-party identity service that hasaccess to or is at least partially synchronized with the master CMDB.

Continuing with the embodiment of 111 and at 112, the CMDB complianceservice configures the master CMDB to permit security that is specificto each distribute computing infrastructure to be independentlymaintained and enforced by each DCI. Here, more limited security desiredby each DCI can be permitted to be maintained on each DCI; however, if aparticular DCI attempts to broaden access rights beyond that which isdefined in the master CMDB then such a situation is not permitted unlessa policy of the CMDB so permits.

In an embodiment, at 113, the CMDB compliance service configures themaster CMDB to permit each DCI to control the creation, deployment, andmanagement of each distributed computing infrastructure's workloads aslong as the sub policies and sub configuration settings (discussed belowwith reference to the processing at 120) remain in compliance with themaster configuration settings and the master policies. So, each DCI canalso independently manage and control their own workloads providing suchmanagement and control does not conflict with the master CMDB.

In another situation, at 114, the CMDB compliance service configures themaster CMDB to permit the distributed computing infrastructures toestablish trust relationships (secure communication and authentication)with one another for purposes of cooperating with workload managementand control as long as the master configuration settings and the masterpolicies are not violated. So, independence in relationships and sharingamong the distributed computing infrastructures are capable so long ascompliance enforced in the master CMDB is maintained.

At 120, the CMDB compliance service interfaces a plurality of sub CMDB'swith the master CMDB to coordinate sub configuration settings and subpolicies with the master configuration settings and the master policiesof the master CMDB. Each sub CMDB controls a particular set of thedistributed computing resources and each set defines a particulardistributed computing infrastructure (distributed processingenvironment). So, a plurality of distributed processing environments(cloud infrastructure) maintains their own independent sub CMDB. The subCMDB's are coordinated with the master CMDB to maintain compliancedefined in the master configuration settings and the master policies ofthe master CMDB.

According to an embodiment, at 130, the CMDB compliance service furtherconfigures one or more of the distributed computing infrastructures tokeep some of their sub policies and some of their sub configurationsettings for their sub CMDB's in synchronization with data centerpolicies and data center configuration settings for a data center. Here,the data center may itself maintain and manage a data center CMDB thathas the data center policies and data center configuration settings. Itis noted that data center CMDB may be associated with enterprise policy,whereas the master CMDB is associated with IaaS provider policies.Selective information between the sub CMDB's and the data center CMDBare synchronized and separately and independent other informationbetween the sub CMDB's and the master CMDB are synchronized. Onconfliction situations, audits events are emitted and/or changes are notpermitted. So, essentially both an enterprise and an IaaS providercontrol the distributed computing infrastructure environments(mini-clouds).

Continuing with the embodiment of 130 and at 131, the CMDB complianceservice provides a mapping schema to permit the exchange of changesoccurring in the sub policies, sub configuration settings, data centerpolicies, and data center configuration settings with the one or moredistributed computing infrastructures and the data center. The subpolicies, and sub configuration settings may be in a different formatfrom that which is associated with the data center policies and the datacenter configuration settings. Thus, disparate formats maintained indisparate CMDB's are synchronized via a mapping schema.

Continuing with the embodiment of 131 and at 132, the CMDB complianceservice keeps the master configuration settings and the master policiesin synchronization with some of the sub configuration settings, some ofthe sub policies of the one or more distributed computinginfrastructures. In other words, the master CMDB, the sub CMDB's, andthe data center CMDB are partially coordinated with one another in anautomated and dynamic fashion. This is done separate and independent ofthe partially coordination between the sub CMDB's and the data centerCMDB.

In another case of the embodiment at 131 and at 133, the CMDB complianceservice ensures that the synchronization between the one or moredistributed computing infrastructures and the master CMDB or separatesynchronization between the one or more distributed computinginfrastructures and the data center CMDB remain in compliance with themaster configuration settings and the master policies of the master CMDBand in compliance with the data center policies and data centerconfiguration settings. Here, the master CMDB and the data center CMDBeach separate controls, monitors, and ensures compliance of themini-cloud infrastructures overlaid on the network.

In yet another situation of the embodiment at 131 and at 132, the CMDBcompliance service permits the data center to share one or morecomputing resources managed within the one or more distributed computinginfrastructures. So, resources lacking in the data center are acquiredvia the one or more distributed computing environments.

It is noted that the data center and its CMDB along with the master CMDBboth independently and separately serve as controlling entities fortheir configuration settings and policy. So, any changes in the datacenter CMDB are synchronized with the CMDB's associated with each of thedistributed computing infrastructures, but such a change is notpropagated back to the master CMDB. Furthermore, changes in the masterCMDB are synchronized with the CMDB's of the distributed computinginfrastructures (mini-clouds as depicted in FIG. 4 discussed below), butsuch a change is not propagated back to the data center CMDB. Also,should a change violate what is defined in the data center CMDB or themaster CMDB, then an audit event can be generated and the change notpermitted. So, although synchronization takes place between either thedistribute computing infrastructure and the data center or thedistributed computing infrastructure and the master CMDB, changes inthese relationship interactions are not permitted when a violationoccurs in either the master CMDB or the data center CMDB.

FIG. 2 is a diagram of another method 200 for cloud control andmanagement, according to an example embodiment. The method 200(hereinafter “distributed infrastructure unifying service”) isimplemented in a machine-accessible and computer-readable storage mediumas instructions that execute on one or more processors of a networknode. The distributed infrastructure unifying service is operationalover a network. The network may be wired, wireless, or a combination ofwired and wireless. Furthermore, the processor is specificallyconfigured to process the distributed infrastructure unifying service.

At 210, the distributed infrastructure unifying service interfaces adata center CMDB with a second CMDB defined for a distributed computingenvironment over the network. This is achieved in a variety of mannersand includes a variety of beneficial features.

For example, at 211, the distributed infrastructure unifying serviceuses a mapping schema to translate information included in a data centerschema for the data center CMDB with information included in a secondschema for the second CMDB. This was discussed above with reference tothe method 100 of the FIG. 1.

Continuing with the embodiment of 211 and at 212, the distributedinfrastructure unifying service also performs one or moretransformations defined in the mapping schema to translate and convertinformation when the information in the data center schema is disparateor different from the information in the second schema. Here, this caninclude first normalizing the disparate information to a format definedin the mapping schema and then translating from the normalizedinformation to a specific format desired or needed in either the datacenter schema or the second schema.

According to an embodiment, at 213, the distributed infrastructureunifying service also configures the data center to share one or morecomputing resources controlled in the distributed computing environment.So, the data center may just include processing resources and storageresources are borrowed or shared with some of the distributed computingenvironments. Another case may be that the data center just includesstorage resources and processing resources are borrowed or shared withsome of the distributed computing resources. It is noted, that in somecases the data center may have each type of desired computing resourcebut needs to expand based on capacity to borrow or share that type ofresource from one of the distributed computing environments.

In another situation, at 214, the distributed infrastructure unifyingservice interfaces the second CMDB with a master CMDB. This case wasdiscussed at length above with reference to the method 100 of the FIG.1.

Continuing with the embodiment of 214 and at 215, the distributedinfrastructure unifying service also configures the master CMDB and thedata center CMDB to receive notifications on conflicts that occur withthe synchronization between the master CMDB and the second CMDB (reportto the data center) and separately and independent conflicts that occurwith the synchronization between the second CMDB and the data centerCMDB (report to the IaaS provider).

The master CMDB may be viewed as a CMDB provided by an IaaS provider tocontrol mini-cloud infrastructures for compliance, such as operationalcompliance and identified as K in FIG. 4, discussed below. The datacenter CMDB may be viewed as a CMDB for an enterprise where theenterprise is separately enforcing regulatory compliance; this CMDB isidentified as T in FIG. 4, discussed below. The second CMDB may beviewed as each mini-clouds CMDB that is kept in separate synchronizationwith both the data center CMDB and the IaaS CMDB; there can be aplurality of these second CMDB's, these CMDB's are identified as V, W,and X in FIG. 4, discussed below.

At 220, the distributed infrastructure unifying service dynamicallykeeps the data center CMDB in selective synchronization with portions ofthe second CMDB. So, an enterprise associated with the data center CMDBcan ensure compliance of enterprise policy on the mini-cloud (secondCMDB processing environment). It is noted, that a separate master CMDBassociated with an IaaS provider of the second CMDB and othermini-clouds can also keep selective portions of the second CMDB insynchronization with the master CMDB. So, both the enterprise and theIaaS provider have control over the mini-cloud. Conflicts with changesin the mini-cloud (second CMDB environment) and the master CMDB or thedata center CMDB can cause an auditing event and may in some cases beentirely prohibited according to global policy.

FIG. 3 is a diagram of a cloud control management system 300, accordingto an example embodiment. The cloud control management system 300 isimplemented in a machine-accessible and computer-readable storage mediumas instructions that execute on one or more processors (multiprocessor)and that is operational over a network. The one or more processors arespecifically configured to process the components of the cloud controlmanagement system 300. Moreover, the network may be wired, wireless, ora combination of wired and wireless. In an embodiment, the cloud controlmanagement system 300 implements, among other things, certain aspects ofthe methods 100 and 200 represented by the FIGS. 1 and 2, respectively.

The cloud control management system 300 includes a distributedprocessing environment compliance service 301 and a plurality ofprocessing environment compliance services 302. Each of these and theirinteractions with one another will now be discussed in turn.

The distributed processing environment compliance service 301 isimplemented within and resides within a computer-readable storage mediumand is to process on one or more processors of the network. Exampleaspects of the distributed processing environment compliance service 301were presented in detail with reference to the methods 100 and 200 ofthe FIGS. 1 and 2, respectively.

The distributed processing environment compliance service 301 isconfigured to keep configuration settings and policies for a pluralityof distributed processing environments in compliance with masterconfiguration settings and master policies.

According to an embodiment, the distributed processing environmentcompliance service 301 and the plurality of processing environmentcompliance services 302 are further configured to keep sub configurationsettings and sub policies associated with each distributed processingenvironment in synchronization with one another.

In another situation, the distributed processing environment complianceservice 301 is configured to audit each of the distributed processingenvironments for compliance with the master configuration settings andthe master policies.

Each of the processing environment compliance services 302 areimplemented within and resides within a computer-readable storage mediumand are to process on one or more processors of the network. Exampleaspects of each of the processing environment compliance services 302were discussed above with reference to the methods 100 and 200 of theFIGS. 1 and 2, respectively.

Each processing environment compliance service 302 is configured tomanage a particular distributed processing environment and furtherconfigured to interact with the distributed processing environmentcompliance service 301 in order to stay in compliance and to enforcecompliance on each distributed processing environment.

According to an embodiment, the distributed processing environmentcompliance service 301 and each of the processing environment complianceservices 302 are also configured to interact with an identity service toenforce identity-based security on each of the distributed processingenvironments.

FIG. 4 is a diagram depicting interactions between components of a cloudcontrol management system, such as cloud control management system 300of the FIG. 3 (discussed above).

Interaction of the components and processing scenarios are now providedin detail with reference to the FIG. 4.

A collection of hardware at a hardware layer (depicted as A) includesstorage depicted as C. Processing occurs at B and networking occurs atE. B also depicts a virtualization layer.

The combination of A and B provides an Infrastructure as a Service(IaaS) architecture, where workloads can be deployed.

The techniques presented herein and above provide for a master CMDB atK, which is configured to hold configurations and policies for theconstruction, management, and deployment of workloads so that allworkloads deployed within the overall network are controlled by thedefinitions of the CMDB and such that an IaaS vendor has reliable andverifiable assurance of the manner in which the workloads are created,deployed, managed, and configured for use within F.

The techniques presented herein also provide for the utilization ofCloud Security Service (CSS), which is shown at M.

The techniques also permit mini-clouds (identified as Customer A-CMini-Clouds in the FIG. 4) to be controlled and policies expressed inthe CMDB such that M. is also constrained by IaaS policies andconfiguration.

Mini-clouds can be created by introducing the CSS as shown at N, O, andP whereby the CSS in the mini-cloud provides annexation andjurisdictional boundaries specific to the mini-cloud.

The techniques also provide for the cooperation of the CMDB's within themini-cloud shown at V, W, and X, such that the CMDB's in the mini-cloudshave a dependency on the CMDB at K, so that, while the mini cloud CMDBcontrols the creation, deployment, management, etc., the mini-cloud isalso constrained by the CMDB at K. Thus, IaaS policies andconfigurations are also enforced. The mini-cloud CMDB is also separatelyand independently constrained by the enterprise's data center CMDB at T.

The techniques also provide for trust relationships to be specifiedbetween mini-clouds because of the opportunity to create those trustrelationships between N and M; O and M; P and M; and thus, between N andO; etc. So, the techniques provide for a constrained trust relationshipwithin F, such that workloads within each mini cloud and theircooperation between mini clouds are controlled by policy andconfiguration in each of the various CMDB's, but more importantlycontrolled by strictures defined in the master CMDB at K, which providespolicy and configuration oversight enforcement.

The techniques also provide for customer data centers to be integratedinto F. In an embodiment, customer A has a fully defined customer datacenter such that a CMDB exist at T, a data repository at R, identityinformation at U, policy and certificate management at S, and access tothe CSS in the appropriate mini-cloud at Q.

In an embodiment, the CMDB at T is coordinated with the CMDB at V, suchthat changes in V, X, and/or W are kept in synch with T. V isconstrained by the settings and policies maintained in T. Additionally,should any changes in V, X, and/or W violate what is in the IaaS CMDB K,then an audit event is raised and such a change may not be permitteddepending on policy. Similarly, changes between K and V, X, and W areseparately and independently synchronized but changes to V are notnecessarily synchronized with T. Again, should any change in V violatewhat is in T then an audit event can be raised and depending on policythat change may not be permitted. In this manner, an IaaS provider via Kand an enterprise via T can separately control the configurationsettings and policies in the mini-cloud CMDB's V when conflicts occur inK or T audit events are raised and the changes not permitted, accordingto policy.

In an embodiment, the CMDB at T and CMDB at V have different schemas andthere is a mapping schema between the two such that the pertinentinformation between the data center and the mini-cloud are expressed andtransformations between the two are defined.

In an embodiment, the schemas between V and K are different and there isa mapping schema that allows the CMDB at V to be normalized with theCMDB at K in a similar manner. Thus, there exists a schema between thetwo such that pertinent information between the CMDB are expressed andtransformations between the two are defined.

In an embodiment, the CMDB at T and V and K are managed in such a waythat any changes to any of T, V, and/or K, as per policy andconfiguration stipulations, are always monitored and tracked so that themini cloud becomes a natural extension of the data center and itspolicies and at the same time also conforms with all the configurationand policy of the IaaS. Again, when conflicts arise audit events areraised and the changes may be prohibited.

In an embodiment, a customer data center may include only portions ofwhat was described above, such as Z and Y, the CMDB exist solely in themini-cloud but the jurisdictional marshaling and annexation previouslydisclosed occurs through O and Y, as constrained by the relationshipbetween the CMDB at W and K, which has the same relationship andtransformation schema definition as described previously.

In an embodiment, the customer data center may include only browser orclient access methods such as that which is shown at 1. In this case,the mini-cloud is accessed via P and all repository data, identity data,etc. are held in the mini-cloud but is constrained by the CMDB policiesand configuration constraints as shown at X.

In an embodiment, changes to any of the CMDB's such as that at (T and Vand K) or (W and K) or (X and K) are propagated between the appropriateCMDB as controlled by aggregate policy and configurations expressedwithin each of the CMDB's. In this case, the aggregation is approved bypolicies and configurations in all CMDB's in order for any change to bemade.

In an embodiment, multiple IaaS environments cooperating to rationalizeand coordinate via the CMDB's at K.

In an embodiment, the various IaaS environments have CMDB schemas, whichare different in which case the same mechanism described earlierconcerning relationship mappings in a schema between the schemas and atransformation mapping are provided to unify the various IaaSenvironments ZZ, which further provides for the unification of variouscustomer mini clouds even though they are spread across disparateInfrastructure as a Service environments.

The above description is illustrative, and not restrictive. Many otherembodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewingthe above description. The scope of embodiments should therefore bedetermined with reference to the appended claims, along with the fullscope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.

The Abstract is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. §1.72(b) and willallow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature and gist of thetechnical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that itwill not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of theclaims.

In the foregoing description of the embodiments, various features aregrouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamliningthe disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted asreflecting that the claimed embodiments have more features than areexpressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claimsreflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of asingle disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are herebyincorporated into the Description of the Embodiments, with each claimstanding on its own as a separate exemplary embodiment.

1. (canceled)
 2. A method, comprising: managing resources of workloads through a configuration repository and when at least two resources communicate via a specific protocol defining that protocol in a setting within the configuration repository; and interfacing the resources and the workloads via settings defined in the configuration repository.
 3. The method of claim 2 further comprising, obtaining a policy assigned to at least one of the resources and performing an action defined in the policy when the at least one of the resources is accessed.
 4. The method of claim 2 further comprising, obtaining a hierarchy of policies relevant to the resources and enforcing each of the policies against the resources.
 5. The method of claim 3, wherein enforcing further includes overriding enforcement of at least one policy based on a different policy appearing at a higher level the hierarchy of policies from that which the at least one policy appears.
 6. The method of claim 2 further comprising, obtaining security policies from the configuration repository and configuring each infrastructure associated with each of the resources with security enforcement in accordance with a particular security policy for that infrastructure.
 7. The method of claim 2 further comprising, interfacing infrastructure configuration repositories associated with infrastructures of each of the resources with the configuration repository.
 8. The method of claim 7, wherein interfacing further includes overriding policies defined in the infrastructure configuration repositories when those policies conflict with particular policies defined in the configuration repository.
 9. The method of claim 7 further comprising, synchronizing at least some policies in the infrastructure configuration repositories with particular policies defined in the configuration repository.
 10. The method of claim 7 further comprising, raising an audit even when at least one policy in the infrastructure configuration repositories conflict with at least one particular policy defined in the configuration repository.
 11. The method of claim 7 further comprising, mapping policies defined in the infrastructure repositories represented in a first format to other policies defined in the configuration repository represented in a second format, wherein the first format and the second format are disparate formats from one another.
 12. A method, comprising: automatically interfacing a data center configuration repository associated with distributed infrastructures with infrastructure configuration repositories for each of the distributed infrastructures; and automatically managing the distributed infrastructures as a data center through the interfaced configuration repositories, wherein automatically managing further includes defining a specific protocol between at least two distributed resources when those resources communicate with one another, the specific protocol defined by a setting in the data center configuration repository.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein automatically interfacing further includes translating schema definitions defining the infrastructure configuration repositories to data center definitions defining the data center configuration repository.
 14. The method of claim 12, wherein automatically interfacing further includes sharing at least one data center resource accessible from a data center infrastructure with each of the distributed infrastructures.
 15. The method of claim 12, wherein automatically interfacing further includes overriding policies defined in the infrastructure configuration repositories when those policies conflict with data center policies defined in the data center configuration repository.
 16. The method of claim 12, wherein automatically interfacing further includes configuring security policies defined in the data center configuration repository within each of the distributed infrastructures.
 17. The method of claim 12, wherein configuring further includes defining audit events to be raised within each of the distributed infrastructures when the security policies are violated within the distributed infrastructures.
 18. The method of claim 12, wherein managing further includes receiving notifications from each of the distributed infrastructures when conflicts between policies of the data center configuration repository conflict with other policies of the infrastructure configuration repositories.
 19. The method of claim 18, wherein receiving further includes directing an automated action to be processed within the distributed infrastructures in response to the notifications relevant to the conflicts.
 20. A system, comprising: a data center server; and a plurality of distributed processing environments configured to be accessible over a network; wherein the data center server is configured to: i) interface the distributed processing environments with one another, ii) manage the distributed processing environments as a single data center processing environment through a configuration repository, and iii) defining a communication protocol that at least two resources are to process to communication with one another from different ones of the distributed processing environment through a setting defined in the configuration repository.
 21. The system of claim 20, wherein the data center server is further configured to: iv) override any policy conflict that occurs between one or more of the distributed processing environments and the configuration repository. 